Saturday, 17 May 2014

ONstage Tonight at Festival: Peterborough Theatre Guild

Our final performance at Theatre Ontario Festival 2014 is a play seen at Festival back in 2001.  The theatre company that hosted that 2001 Festival is now the producer of the 2014 production, as Peterborough Theatre Guild presents Martin McDonagh’s The Beauty Queen of Leenane, representing the Eastern Ontario Drama League (EODL).

Peterborough Theatre Guild began in 1965, purchasing and renovating an old church that had been gutted by a fire.  They have hosted our Theatre Ontario Festival three times, in 1980, 1993, and 2001.  Peterborough Theatre Guild has represented EODL many times at Festival—most recently in Sault Ste. Marie in 2012 with the original script The Mouse House by Robert Ainsworth, which won Peterborough their third Elsie Award for Outstanding Production (following wins in 2006 in Sarnia for Someone Who’ll Watch Over Me, and in 2008 in North Bay for Proof.)

The Beauty Queen of Leenane
Peterborough Theatre Guild
Alex Saul, Scott Drummond, Patricia Young
Photo by Theresa James
Set in the village of Leenane, Connemara, Ireland in the early 1990s, the play centers on Maureen Folan, an emotionally-taut, middle-aged spinster and her relationship with her malevolent mother, Mag, who manipulates and exploits her daughter to keep her psychologically enslaved as a caregiver. Into this scenario of domestic toxicity comes Pato Dooley, a gentle, long-time admirer of Maureen who is leaving to work in the U.S.A. and wants Maureen to come with him. It’s a last chance opportunity for Maureen to escape her prison and Mag quickly recognizes the threat to her own selfish comforts.

At the 2014 EODL Festival, Peterborough Theatre Guild won the Leslie M. Frost Award for Best Production, Best Actress in a Major Role (Alex Saul as Maureen Folan), and Acting Excellence—Male (Scott Drummond as Pato Dooley), with honourable mentions for Best Director (Jerry Allen), Actor in a Major Role (Luke Foster as Ray Dooley), Ensemble, Set Design (Al Tye), and Use of Speech (Sharon Guildea, Dialect Coach).

Read more about Theatre Ontario Festival 2014 on our website

Director's Vision: Highlights of Bea Quarrie's Festival Adjudicator's Workshop

Bea Quarrie's "Director's Vision" Workshop
by Brandon Moore, Communications Coordinator
  • Bea reads a play seven times before she tries to say anything about it, and to see if still holds power
  • Her most recent production was Shrek: The Musical, which she initially thought seemed unlikely
  • She connected with exploring the differences between fables, fairy tales, myths - and how these stories are now access more via Disney's adaptations
  • She wanted to make the characters more like original folk tales, and ended up focusing on a distinct visual style of Russian folk tales (Shrek must look like Shrek, but Humpty Dumpty initially was conceived to look more like a Faberge egg, the Bears looked like Russian bears, the castle looked like a Russian character)
  • Breaks down each scene for atmosphere and environment, relationships, action, plot, design needs; she does this on large sheets of paper which are not shared with the cast
  • When she directed Vern Thiessen's Vimy, her way into the play was exploring the First World War "from the other side" (As shared at the morning adjudication, Bea was raised and learned about the war in Hungary)
  • Because of the poetry of the text, every rehearsal started with a reading of war poetry; cast was instructed to bring in letters or photographs to heighten their personal connection
  • Workshop participants were invited to share their own approaches to finding and articulating vision
  • Also discussed variation in vision, illustrated in the National Theatre of England's Five Truths exhibition
  • She talked about wanting to direct an adaptation of Hedda Gabler; worked hard to find an adaptation she liked before settling on Judith Thompson's
  • Discussed challenge of distilling vision of a play down to one line: demands precision, thoughtfulness, clarity

Friday, 16 May 2014

Highlights of the Adjudication of The Curtain Club's Lenin's Embalmers

by Bruce Pitkin, Executive Director
  • Bea began by singing in Russian and tells of her own experiences of Stalinism in her native Hungary when she was a child in 1953
  • Bravo, everyone, it is a risky choice. Risky because of title, content and style. Risky to take to Festival, since it is reliant on split-second timing and has high technical challenges. A lot of preparation is required by the technicians and actors to make sure everything works.
  • Bea posed questions to each actor
  • Lenin: What do you think the author wanted to do with this role? Do you think your character changes during the show?
  • Boris/Vlad: What is your central motivation and how are you different from each other
    Mark Hayward and Phil Dionne in
    The Curtain Club's Lenin's Embalmers
    Photo by Davis Strong

  • Nadia: What were the challenges in your three roles?
  • Stalin: What is the core of the character? Are you an evil clown?
  • Krasin: How did you develop this character and the physicality? What was the key to your character?
  • Agent 1 / 2: What were the distinct characteristics of each role? How did you keep them different?
  • Question for the Director, why this play and why now?
  • You are trying to create pretty heavy duty stuff. The audience is not aware of this story or these characters. How do you take them into this world? How are they reacting to it? The audience was absorbed and they were also puzzled. This play provokes them and does not answer all the questions. It is an inconclusive world.
  • Lighting crew was quite a large one. The Curtain Club talked about everyone who was involved, how smoothly they functioned together and how much fun it was. It is a demanding show for lights and sound. Were the footlights fully operational all the time? The lighting designer said, not all the time as a design choice. Audience commented that they could not read the sign boards as they traveled across the stage. Lighting the sign boards presented a challenge in the new space. The audience missed some of the content, but Bea appreciated the concept of titling the settings.
  • What happened at the top of the show with Lenin’s first entrance? Lenin seemed not to realize that he was not in his light. After that, things went smoothly, although it does have a ripple effect on the rest to try harder.
  • Fabulous work on the precision of the physicality. Very difficult to execute and maintain. You have to be able to do the pattern with speed. It sets up a nice contrast to the larger than life aspect of the characters, such as Stalin.
  • When reading the script, there is so much openness and room for interpretation, which is not easy to develop and keep a progression going.
  • Vodka plays a large role in the show and it was interesting to watch the pattern of the drinking in the show, which was well executed. Nice alacrity in the use of props. Director explained her choices with the props and set pieces, in order to keep a simplicity in the style. Bea talks about how that sets up a convention and being consistent throughout. Audience then experiences the shifts more readily.
  • First time for Bea to see a cadaver being operated on onstage. Even though there was a gruesome aspect to it, the audience stayed with you via comedy. Bea would have liked more clarity during the guard sequence, as the lighting was murky. That was a technical issue rather than a design choice.
  • Who chose the music? The sound designer did well in choosing many different kinds of music, which were quite evocative and captured the moments well. Music heightens the sense of survival, since it is all you have left and preserves your sanity in difficult times.
  • Through all of the farce in the play, the audience must still feel the reality of the pain. How do you do that when the main protagonists can be unlikeable? What is the difference between the two characters?
  • How did the director get the cast and crew to buy into her vision? Director talked about how she connected with everyone involved in the production and created the unity of the vision.
  • Does Stalin dip into madness? What is his journey? What was your actor’s journey? Stalin talked about exploring the bi-polar nature of the character and making his mood changes very fast.
  • Who do we rely on to get information? What version of history will stand? Who do you trust in this play? Author knows of the price that the ordinary person pays living under a dictatorship. And then how do you make a comedy about it?
  • What was the author doing in creating the role of Lenin? It is really hard to play an idea or be a symbol. The through-line for Lenin is tricky, in not being just a symbol, you need to play him as a man.
  • Nadia, which role gave you the most challenge - Nadia 1, 2 or 3? Nadia talked about the differences in the three characters and constantly seeking. A good actor keeps seeking to find and refine their process. Cameo roles can be difficult, due to the specificity and quickness of the development time on stage. Be aware of not playing the resolution of the character, keep seeking.
  • Stalin is also still questing to the very end of the play, so he doesn’t play the resolution.
  • How did you create the physicality of the Krasin character? Krasin spoke of his process in discovering how he got into the head of the character. What was achieved with Krasin, was that he evoked pity from the audience, which is essential for the audience to care about the character. Gave this subservient character some dignity. ‘A man caught in the middle,’ is how the author describes the character, he is stretched to the extremes.
  • Agent 1 and 2, what were the distinct characteristics that defined you? Agent 2 and 1, talked about the motivations of their characters. The rewards of power are important.
  • How romantic was the kiss over the cadaver
  • Bea half-seriously expected to see some dancing onstage, due to the boisterous energy of the music.
  • Nice playing of the pauses in the script. Good delivery of the lines. There was a really nice progression in the vodka drinking sequences. Nice timing on ‘A job for life.’ Great build to ‘Trust me.’
  • Discussed if could have parked Lenin in one place or in the same place, for greater effect.
  • First appearance of Stalin in his white jacket is stunning, because of the stark contrast to the beiges and greys, beforehand.
  • Bea had difficulty hearing some of the actors onstage at the very beginning. Not sure if it was only a lack of adjustment to the space. Be aware of projecting and articulating in the larger space.
  • Finally, it’s great to celebrate the work, and the insanity too, that goes into taking on a new challenge. You are good risk takers.

ONstage Tonight at Festival: Gateway Theatre Guild

Our second Pulitzer-Prize winning script of the week is on the stage tonight, as Gateway Theatre Guild presents David Mamet’s Glengarry Glen Ross, representing QUONTA and northeastern Ontario community theatre at Theatre Ontario Festival 2014.

Gateway Theatre Guild is the oldest of the four theatre companies, and have been producing theatre in North Bay since 1948.  Hosts of Theatre Ontario Festival in 2008, they last represented QUONTA at Festival in 2010 in London, winning the Elsie for Outstanding Festival Production for Waiting For Godot.  They also won the Festival’s Outstanding Production award in 1974 for their production of David French’s Leaving Home.

Glengarry Glen Ross
Gateway Theatre Guild
Verlyn Plowman and Morgan Bedard
Photo by Ed Regan Photography
Glengarry Glen Ross won the Pulitzer Prize for Drama in 1984.  It is a scorching examination of Reagan-era America, as a group of real estate salesmen try to lie, cheat and steal their way to the top, clawing over anyone who crosses their path.

At the 2014 QUONTA Festival in Sault Ste. Marie, Gateway Theatre Guild won Outstanding Production, Outstanding Director (Joshua Bainbridge), and Outstanding Visual Presentation, with two nominations each for Outstanding Supporting Actor (Morgan Bedard as John Williamson and Brad Carr as Dave Moss), and Newcomer Actor (Shawn Parker and Zachary Smithers).

Read more about Theatre Ontario Festival 2014 on our website

In Conversation with David S. Craig

by Bruce Pitkin, Executive Director

David is quite happy to be here at the 2014 Festival.  His play Having Hope at Home, set in a farmhouse in Blyth, has had nineteen productions, been produced in Germany, as well as a production by some of today’s attendees.

Let’s look back, thousands of years ago, to the discovery and control of fire. With fire, nightlife was born. So, what did people do with this nightlife? They made music and then told stories. Stories about their own successes and tragedies. Storytelling was created, then people told stories directly to other people, or their public.

In 400 BC, a change occurred, where instead of one storyteller, different people assumed roles in the story and faced each other. Storytelling begat performance. The Greeks then created rules about performance and this new art form. Greek style theatres existed all over the Mediterranean, and later, all over the world. This was the beginning of the fourth wall in performance.

David, at eight years old, sat in a theatre in Montreal, looking at everything around him on and off the stage. He asked his mother, “How did they get up there?” “Shhh!” said his mother, however, his curiosity kept growing. At boarding school, he auditioned for the school play and got a lead role. At his very first curtain call, the applause gave him such a rush, that it converted him to the theatre. That moment he fell in love with the theatre, and of course, all theatre people have this moment. And this very same moment, connects all of us to the discovery of theatre by the ancients.

David went to study at Queen’s University and he saw a performance from British troupe who told a contemporary story, in a bare room, with few props. Another revelation. “How did they get up there?” At that moment, he decided to leave university to pursue theatre training, cutting all strings to conventional life, to take the risk of creating theatre.

To while the time until success arrived, David’s created a kid’s show and that led to another and another, and eventually to a thirty year career writing for the theatre.

He eschewed political theatre for realism, until one day he heard a report on CBC Radio about child homelessness. He began to research about children who become homeless in order to write a story to about them. This led to Danny, King of the Basement, his most produced play here and abroad. He then read excerpts from the play. Afterward, he talked about how kids in the audience related to the plight of the kids in the play. Danny, King of the Basement struck a chord with youth audiences and educators alike, leading to productions across North America. Theatre CAN change people’s attitudes and feelings, subsequently changing their mindset over time.

David did focus groups in high schools to see how to connect with the students there, which led to a series of plays by Roseneath Theatre. They worked at creating theatre for schools, which would perform at the schools themselves. The idea was not very well received, either ideologically or financially. So, they went to the Health Departments within the schools to look for support, then created plays with health related themes, which were well received. The plays, and the issues raised in them, connected well with the high school students. He read an excerpt from one of these plays.

The kids who waited for a message play, were impressed that there wasn’t a neat or ‘happy’ conclusion and that they could finish the story themselves. However, American educators did not like the ending and wanted one where the issues were resolved at the end. That didn’t happen and they play has been David’s most widely produced play. Even as far away as in Turkey, where it appealed to that audience’s strong sense of family.

David met with an American producer, who said that while she liked his plays, she couldn’t produce them, since they did not appeal to the American narrative of redemption. However, she did ask him to ‘pitch her a title’, something that would be familiar to her audiences. That led to David’s choice to do a stage adaption of The Neverending Story. He read an excerpt.

The difference between trying to find prospective producers for Danny, King of the Basement or Having Hope at Home and The Neverending Story, is that people came to him because of the familiarity of Story. This has furthered his work as an adapter, which also gives him the perspective of a producer, in understanding how the play will be produced and received. So working on adaptations has become an important facet of David’s work.

He has also created radio dramas for CBC Radio, although not lately since that department no longer exists. Once he was approached to write a radio special and David responded with the spontaneous idea of retelling the birth of Christ, which then became The First Christmas. He read an excerpt from his ninety minute radio play, which he has adapted for the stage.

David then shared with us the gestation of Having Hope at Home. It came from a reflection on how different generations have differences in their expectations. He had wanted to be there at the birth of his child and decided to have the birth at home. His wife and he hired a midwife who spent time with them and advised them on the birth process. During that time the midwife shared stories of child birth and David decided to write with midwifery as the subject of a play. He eventually wrote about the relationships and personal crisis of the mother to those around her, to make the story more universal. The response to his first submission to the Blyth Festival was not well received. It sat in his bottom drawer until he decided to send it out again to be read. Later, he tried Blyth once more, but was again rebuffed. After a while, and a few artistic directors later, he submitted it one last time and third time lucky, it was produced to wonderful acclaim. He read an excerpt.

David is pleased to have been able to write works that are considered part of the literary canon. In writing, he has discovered that there are rules, hidden rules, which although sometimes challenging, give his work a richness that he cherishes.

Canadian story telling is on the ascendancy. And although Canadians don’t have the same polarization in society as Americans, which makes for very different kind of dramatic work, we still love telling and hearing our own stories. They tell us who we are.

Playwright-in-Person is made possible by a grant from the Playwrights Guild of Canada, funded by the Canada Council.